in every city hall and they keep banging their heads against the same wall, expecting a different outcome. That’s insanity!
(5 minute read)
The “banging heads … insanity” phrase is attributed to Albert Einstein, and if he were here today, and was asked his opinion on governments, I am certain he would say, “I told you so – same people doing the same old, same old.” Obviously, the White House is an anomaly, a wild card, and its level of insanity needs no discussion. But in terms of recent happenings in Canada’s biggest province, Ontario, Einstein might add, “Watch out.” The ascension of Doug Ford from Ward 2 city councillor in Toronto to Premier of Ontario, reigning over all municipalities, is a flashing red light for local governments. And that’s not a left-right, political perspective, it’s a autocratic versus democratic perspective.
Outside of making good on bumper-sticker, campaign promises, why should a premier, of any political stripe, who is elected by only 24% of eligible voters, have unfettered authority over 444 municipalities? Ford was elected by 2.3 million people, a fraction of the 11 million people living in municipalities (approximately 80% of the province’s 13.9 million people reside in urban areas) and yet, he now holds intrusive powers over every town and city. His vote total is less than the population of Toronto (2.8 million), which he is now trying to bully to his will. This dominion of power hearkens back to the dark days of monarchies. It’s absurd.
Use your head or lose it
Newly ensconced on the provincial throne, Ford is autocratically attempting to dictate how Toronto should structure its council – without discussion or consultation. Whatever his reasoning, it’s blatantly undemocratic. It sounds more like a lame-brain ploy by an ex-Toronto councillor, who lost to the current mayor, and is now flexing his new-found muscle in a twisted, get-even tactic. Because he can. Because of an archaic system. Because power has gone to his head – like Louis XVI of France. And we know what happened to his head.
Ford and his backers might rationalize his misguided interference as conservative ideology (i.e., small government), but, one, the system should not give a premier so much authority over municipalities, and two, it’s the antithesis of good leadership and democracy. But he’s able to do it because of the monarchy-style subjugation that Ontario municipalities exist under, operating as serfdoms in a premier’s kingdom.
Did I mention, it’s absurd? Insane?
“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” – Lord Acton
Of course, Mr. Ford used to be in the Toronto asylum with his head-banging brother, Rob, where they tried to consolidate more power in the mayor’s office. So now, he’s jamming a pointy-stick in Mayor John Tory’s eye and stirring up his ex-inmates, just before the municipal election. It should be a warning signal to all municipalities, as his “power tends to corrupt” municipalities, it could “corrupt absolutely,” and make the political asylums a whole lot crazier.
“We are standing at the threshold of the information age with an obsolete set of tools.” – Alan Cooper, author The Inmates Are Running the Asylum (2004)
I took my headline from the book, The Inmates Are Running the Asylum because everybody understands its meaning and it illustrates a parallel to what has been going on for decades in municipal governments, where citizens and the democratic process are hampered by “an obsolete set of tools.”
The book addresses why technology so often drives us, the users, crazy. Because most of the people who create the technology are disconnected from, and don’t relate to, the users, the people-in-the-street. They create products with features and interfaces that are often irrelevant to users because they’re designed to relate to the computer’s needs and the engineer’s thinking, not the users. Many “techies” never get outside their walls to understand the true needs of the people they serve, preferring to cocoon in an asylum of like-minded inmates, producing an excess of irrelevancy. It’s a mirror image of local politics.
Do city halls operate like asylums?
The parallel to politics struck me. We’re operating with obsolete tools, where the out-dated municipal system of government is suited to provincial power, at the disempowerment of citizens at the local level. And it doesn’t change simply because voters change the politicians every four years. That’s just shuffling the deckchairs on the provincial Titanic.
What’s needed is a change in the system. And it won’t be done by the inmates, it requires an uprising by the citizens.
At the local level, the incumbent politicians are trapped in the asylum, a political barter system that runs on the trafficking of empty promises, political favours, commercial influence, juicy contracts, compromised consultants, government largess, autocratic intimidation … whatever it takes to control and perpetuate a bad system. Bad for the people, good for those in the system. It’s insanity.
“When dictatorship is a fact, revolution becomes a right.” – Victor Hugo
Reversing the disempowerment of Ontario’s municipal governments starts at the grassroots with a bottom-up movement in towns and cities across the province. It’s up to “we the people” to elect candidates who see the folly in autocratic rule and have a vision of fixing the system, not just roads and sidewalks. We need municipal politicians who will fight for our rights.
It won’t happen overnight and it’s not a one-election issue, it’s a legacy issue.
- What do we believe in?
- What will we stand up for?
- What do we want to pass on to our children and grandchildren?
- What will we do?
Will we continue to dine and dance to the propaganda music of the Titanic and its strongmen captains, and when displeased, simply vote in a new captain and crew? Or will we fix the flaws in the good-ship democracy and change course? Will we give the next generation a better chance?
“We have met the enemy, and he is us.” – Pogo
I used the Pogo quote in last week’s 89.7fm radio commentary because it goes to the heart of our failing political system – “us.” Our apathy, our disengagement, our sense of resignation are the foundation on which the political asylum has been built and allowed to operate – unopposed, unencumbered, unrestrained unchecked.
So check your values, your principles, your vision – for your family’s future – and then check your pulse. If you have one, then there’s no good reason for not contributing to the rebuilding of the only democracy you’ve ever had. And saving it for your children and grandchildren. It starts now, by getting involved in the upcoming elections in jurisdictions everywhere – from Ontario to across the United States. Volunteer, campaign, know the candidates, grill them, donate … and vote (shamefully, half of us don’t).
“If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.”
Well written piece…but I might add that its “Deja-Vu all over again.”
Local governments in the late 60’s and early 70’s fought against
the provincial desire for a “Toronto centered Region” philosophy
in local government and community development. The opposition
to this provincial vision was called the Diamond Triangle.
The great difference in this latest confrontation between the province
and its municipalities is the governments willingness to impose its
will on its cities and towns. Mike Harris et al are all expressions of
the same hubris that is killing local government.
@ Mike: You’re right, the idea of strong local government is anchored in the decentralization of power, which is the antithesis of what provincial governments want, centralization. And today, as more and more people sense the demise of our governments and society, we are inclined to think greater control can solve our problems; thus, we vote in “strongmen” who thrive on centralized control. And when they have the power, they use it. Such so-called leaders are a result of public weakness and opting for “someone” to take charge, control things, rather than “we the people” actually taking control of democracy at the grassroots level and voting in the right people. It can only begin to be resolved at the local level.
I trust your next article(s)will be about a most serious worrying issue emanating from the PMO,that .being.the AG fiasco taking place today,while the PM is on the road discussing the “urgent” climate change issue which is obviously more time sensitive and important than what is taking place here and now.!
Standing in the wings next of course is Vice Admiral Norman’s court case which is another questionable government scenario that also promises to be a public eye opener on what goes on behind the scenes at Federal,level.
The saying “You can fool some of the people all of the time,, all of the people some of the time ,but you can’t fool all of the people ,all of the time .
I think that saying will prove to become a fact within the near future.
All it can do is hopefully put politicians on notice that they are not above the law and responsible to the public and the time of the same old same old is over.